Threads' New Terms & Conditions Affects the Fediverse
wedistribute.org
external-link
Threads, Meta's new microblogging platform, is updating its terms to focus on data collection from "Third Party Users".
@AdminWorker@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
39
edit-2
1Y

Can activity pub change it’s terms to say that all crawlers that use this must be gnu open sources and all information crawled must be open to the public on gnu open sources software (no crawling to a private enterprise)?

My understanding is all the big tech companies are scared of what happened with router software (openwrt) and they don’t want to be forced to let competition be a foss community via gnu licensing.

Nerd02
link
fedilink
English
101Y

Isn’t ActivityPub just an application protocol? To my knowledge there’s no ActivityPub inc. licensing the usage of the protocol or anything like that. A web protocol is just a series of guidelines everyone has agreed on following, you can’t attach terms and conditions to it.

The thing they could do is block the servers of Meta or route to tor for anything sent to meta.

Nerd02
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Eh, it still wouldn’t be “free software” at that point. “Free” also means freedom to send your data to Meta if you want to.

@duncesplayed@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
1Y

Indeed. Licensing usage of something is antithetical to free software culture anyway. It would violate the Free Software Foundation’s Freedom Zero, that you should never have to accept a licence to use something. (This is why free software cannot ever have a EULA, for instance)

Nerd02
link
fedilink
English
31Y

TIL. Never really cared about the legal aspect of FOSS for anything other than slapping a GPL license next to anything I write but that is an interesting fact.

@duncesplayed@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
41Y

It’s come up in interesting cases. I can’t remember which package it was, but there was one package that was distributed under the humourous “Don’t Be Evil License”, where you could “use this software for anything that’s not evil” or something like that. This technically does not qualify as free software (freedom 0 must allow anyone to use it for evil), so Red Hat (I think it was?) had to get their lawyers to contact the developer and get him to give them an exemption to the licence, just in case one of their users used it for evil.

Nerd02
link
fedilink
English
21Y

LMAO that’s hilarious. Love it.

squid
link
fedilink
English
41Y

This is a good shout

@Mane25@feddit.uk
link
fedilink
English
111Y

None of that is particularly the thing that worries me - Meta could be crawling Lemmy right now and getting all that information even if they weren’t planning on supporting federation, but it’s on the public web intentionally to be read, so it’s just like anyone else reading it. The only piece of information I’m surprised would get shared is IP address, and without knowing the technical reasons I’m wondering how/why they would get this and if it’s something Lemmy could fix in software.

The main thing that worries me is still if the toxic culture of Meta’s social networks floods into our communities.

SokathHisEyesOpen
link
fedilink
English
61Y

The main thing that worries me is still if the toxic culture of Meta’s social networks floods into our communities.

That’s exactly why I moved my account to lemmy.ml. lemmy.ml has defederated Threads.

@Mane25@feddit.uk
link
fedilink
English
51Y

Nothing is federated to Threads, they haven’t switched it on yet.

SokathHisEyesOpen
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
1Y

World intended to allow them to be federated, ML publicly stated that they will defederate them. Given that signups to instances are being restricted, I wanted to be sure I’m on an instance that defederates them. I also like the overall sentiment of publicly giving the finger to Zuck

Is there any way to see which communities are defederating? I’m really hoping mine are.

@Mane25@feddit.uk
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Sure, I wish them nothing but failure, but I’m intending to wait around and see what happens first. From what I’ve heard Threads isn’t going well for them anyway. I still worry that even if there’s mass defederation it would still poison the pool, because it would influence the culture of instances that are federated with it and isolate those that aren’t.

Everyone that hasn’t defederated them by now should now.

Scott
link
fedilink
English
11
edit-2
1Y

Everyone needs to defed from them

@Whirlybird@aussie.zone
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Why, because they otherwise would get the same data that every other instance already gets?

This is a big nothingsauce. “Meta gets access to public fediverse data when meta joins fediverse” should be the title.

Hellfire103
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Would it be possible to blacklist Threads, but also whitelist specific accounts? I don’t want any more to do with Meta than I already do, but I’d also like some way of sending questions into The Last Leg.

How does Meta/Facebook get access to IP Address information of the user. Is that public in ActivityPub spec?

@Steve@communick.news
link
fedilink
English
441Y

I’m kinda torn here.

On the one hand, this is Meta we’re talking about. Fuck’em.

On the other, this is all public info on insecure social media. It can all be scraped by anyone who wants to anyway.

@cedarmesa@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
131Y

Few questions for the techy bros and gals.

1 Can threads collect this info on me if I block their instance? 2 Does this only happen if and when they federate? 3 Are they already federated? 4 When will they federate? 5 What steps should I take to protect my information?

@nixfreak@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
21Y

You have to block all thread domains and instances.

FaceDeer
link
fedilink
22
edit-2
1Y

That information is already public knowledge (aside from your IP address, I assume the Threads policy is actually talking about the instance’s IP address). I can collect all of that info about you right now myself, without even running my own instance, because kbin exposes that data. Every other instance that your posts touch gets that info too.

If the Threads instance was defederated, sure, they wouldn’t see it through that particular view. But they could be quietly running any number of other instances out there already just for the purpose of harvesting that info. Or they could be using a webcrawler or an API to get the info from some other third-party instance.

I think ultimately people need to accept that when they post something publicly - posts, comments, profiles, etc - then by the very nature of it being “public” everyone can see it. You can’t simultaneously “protect” and “publish” this information at the same time. It’s the DRM paradox, but even harder to resolve than the usual. The only way you can “protect” this information is to not publish it in the first place - ie, don’t have a profile on the Fediverse and don’t post comments on it. Because the Fediverse is designed to spread that information around.

Kaldo
link
fedilink
9
edit-2
1Y

Please read the article. The data in question, besides the IP that I don’t see how they can get since it’s coming from your instance and not the user directly, is the bare minimum that’s required for AP to even work, and it is the same data that every federated instance is already storing and propagating. The author of the article says as much.

Facebook is a shit company but the privacy of this data is not one of the issues with it. As has been said before already, all of this is already very public, very easy to scrape and it is impossible to prevent it, if you want to keep your profile picture, username and comments private then dont upload them to a federated social network… or well, any social or network at all.

@jet@hackertalks.com
link
fedilink
English
91Y

If somebody else’s federated with them and you comment on a discussion hosted by them, then meta will have your post information

@jet@hackertalks.com
link
fedilink
English
481Y

TLDR - anything the fetty verse sends via activity pub will be recorded by meta.

Create a post

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more…


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

  • 1 user online
  • 7 users / day
  • 17 users / week
  • 29 users / month
  • 519 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 670 Posts
  • 11.1K Comments
  • Modlog