I’ve recently learned that DDG does not follow its own guidelines for privacy. I’m curious what search engines people here would recommend. I would prefer a search engine that not only respects my privacy but also doesn’t hide or shadow ban content it doesn’t like. Any recommendations?

I use SearXNG.

You can pick an instance from here:

https://searx.space/

I use https://searx.namejeff.xyz/ myself because it’s based out of Switzerland and gets good grades.

@shoegazer@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
91Y

I’ve recently learned that DDG does not follow its own guidelines for privacy.

What is your source for this?

@Felix@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
61Y

I used to use https://metager.org/ as my engine. Although they also have a german version with metager.de which is what I personally used, since it’s my native language.

Though I’ve just personally switched to Startpage as my engine.

@manesa@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
31Y

I switch public instances from SearXNG and if I really want google results, I go to Whoogle.

SearXNG, there’s nothing much else to say.

@jtb@feddit.uk
link
fedilink
English
21Y

If it is software how do you know who has implemented it and whether the instance respects privacy?

Self-host yourself is the safest option, I do.

ch1cken
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
10M

deleted by creator

I’m running it on a remote server.

You can use LibRedirect extension which switches you instance of searxng on every search, this maximizes your privacy.

Did qwant become better in the recent time? I tried it a few years back and the search results were meh

Anon
link
fedilink
English
81Y

funny how my one reply on a three year old lemmy post boosted the awareness of DDG’s offenses like this

I would prefer a search engine that not only respects my privacy but also doesn’t hide or shadow ban content it doesn’t like.

The biggest search engine with its own index that cares about your privacy is Mojeek. A lot of “search engines” are actually proxies for other search engines, as Mojeek explains here: https://blog.mojeek.com/2013/10/crawler-based-search-engine.html

This is important, because if the main search provider for these proxies refuses to show results in its index, then every proxy is also affected.

Mojeek was actually the first search engine to have a no-tracking privacy policy, going as far back as 2006: https://www.mojeek.com/about/privacy/

Melody Fwygon
link
fedilink
English
411Y

I suspect that maybe you were exposed to a certain post over on lemmy.ml @ local link: https://lemmy.one/post/657560

I’d invite you to read through my comment deconstructing the silliness of that entire post…the accusations and links are highly flimsy and poorly support the assertions being made. https://lemmy.one/comment/708741

I won’t deny that it’s likely that DDG isn’t as privacy focused today as it may have been when it was initially founded; but I haven’t seen anything on the fediverse compile enough reasons today that would support the panic I’m seeing over it if you just look into what few sources are quoted and being used and assess critically what might be going on.

That being said…

I do recommend SearXNG. Highly.

The metasearch engine that SearXNG offers usually works well and allows you to pick, choose, and sift through the various search engines and even define and create new ones you can use for yourself so that you can easily search whatever you need.

Searx instances in general are kinda like email providers too; just find a good one for yourself and start using it; no real account is required…just find one that works for you and set up your preferences and all.

I do not recommend Kagi! Kagi is a paid search engine. In general I do not consider their paid service to be better than Searx and would not recommend using them. Usage of a paid service requires creating an account…and we all know where that garden path lies.

🇺🇦 Max UL
link
fedilink
English
31Y

I just want to say as a Kagi user I like it a lot. I don’t need to search anything weird, and my search history doesn’t describe acting about my persona I wouldn’t say on my own anyway… many I should be more worried? Not sure, but I believe they don’t track or sell info.

Not sure, but I believe they don’t track or sell info. Doubt they need to with their paid subscription. Though I can’t justify buying Kagi since I barely search anything in of itself.

@Vexz@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Some thoughts from a long term SearXNG user: While I really appreciate how privacy respecting SearXNG is I had a lot of trouble with it. Often enough you get 0 results because of timeouts with the search engines it uses and sometimes the order of the presented search results isn’t good. Sometimes the thing I’ve been searching for was the 10th result while in other search engines it was the first result. So the prioritizing of the results is often enough just odd.

We live in a time where there are so many search engines but all of them have their flaws. It’s really frustrating. :(

Melody Fwygon
link
fedilink
English
21Y

I recommend finding a different instance then. Not every instance is going to be great at it, and you do have to do a lot of fiddling around with preferences and be-bopping between various instances when the current instance is timing out.

…Or you could just hit F5 and try your search query again. For some reason that seems to work sometimes. It is possible to configure an instance to not get slammed; and you can host one yourself too

@Vexz@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
21Y

The problem is that it doesn’t matter which instance I use. I tried multiple instances, even self-hosted one myself. Sooner or later I always had the problem with timeouts (even with my self-hosted local instance) and it’s so damn annoying. Even refreshing the page doesn’t always help. I really don’t feel like hopping from instance to instance just because my preferred instance has timeouts again. Reliability is crucial to me.

Melody Fwygon
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Did you check the preferences on the instance and change the default engine selections? You can check the engines and de-select engines that are turning out to be unreliable with results; which should result in fewer errors.

@Vexz@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Of course I did. The thing is that the reliability of the search engines per instance varies from time to time so there’s not a single instance that will always work perfectly and never has timeouts.

@Grenfur@lemmy.one
creator
link
fedilink
English
31Y

THat is correct. I appreciate the clarity :).

As for SearXNG, you need a means to host an instance of that as well as a domain yeah?

@Vexz@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
21Y

You can find many public hosted instances here but some of them use Cloudflare because they fear DDoS attacks. So keep that in mind when choosing your instance. Best is to host your own instance.

ch1cken
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
10M

deleted by creator

@baduhai@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
21Y

You can host your own, but you can also find a public instance.

I use Brave Browser’s search engine, however the results are less than ideal compared to a big company like Google and I don’t care for the AI generated information paragraph when looking up a topic as the first result. The only real private search engine is searx afaik.

@efscher@lemmy.sdf.org
link
fedilink
English
10
edit-2
1Y

Kagi, searxng

Kagi is slept on for sure

I’ve come around on paying for email (proton mail), but still in the air about paying for search.

Trust me, it’s worth it

Lengsel
link
fedilink
English
51Y

Primarily Brave, on the odd occassion I might have to check Startpage, but Startpge seems to have a suspicious deal with Google, also Startpage requires a verification process if it detects a VPN or Tor.

SearX can be nice, but being an open search platform, the results can be wildly random bases on which instance of SearX you search on.

@Dusty@l.dustybeer.com
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I ended up just hosting my own Searxng instance. Seems a lot easier to control and not be dependent on how someone else has theirs set up.

Lengsel
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Self hosting is always te best way to operate any service.

illectrility
link
fedilink
English
91Y

Startpage (basically a proxy for Google afaik), Murena Spot, SearX, Qwant, SwissCows

I use Qwant and Startpage for most things, but tend towards Qwant due to speed.

I primarily use Startpage for image search, though, because you can specify exact resolutions.

In my phone Murena Spot was always the default search engine and it’s fine. I switch between it and Qwant Lite.

When I want someone to search more privately without getting different results, I always recommend Startpage.

SwissCows is odd, if you can not search “brown sugar”, it is better to avoid it.

Can you elaborate?

There is censorship, there is discrimination and then there is swisscows, it has all.

Who in their right mind would block random innocent searches for no reason?

ch1cken
link
fedilink
11Y

depends on your usecase, some people actually prefer the extreme filters it has to make content family friendly

illectrility
link
fedilink
English
11Y

That is weird… Point taken

@Grenfur@lemmy.one
creator
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I’ll take a look, thank you! I had actually looked into SearX but it seemed like it required some additional setup. I’ll check Startpage and Qwant though!

@Telodzrum@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
121Y

Care to elaborate about DDG? If this is about the Bing thing from last year, that was almost entirely FUD.

@Gwent@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Link to the Lemmy post in question: https://lemmy.one/post/657560

Ultimately, it seems like the post doesn’t provide adequate evidence to prove its claims about DDG.

How is sending user data to Microsoft’s ad tracking service FUD? That’s exactly what privacy preserving browsers are supposed to stop.

DDG has several strikes, one of them was DDG’s CEO announcing that he will censor results, then he denied his own statement.

Every search engine “censors” results. That is literally their job.

@Paper@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Yeah. Every search engine makes a decision about what to show to you and in what order; it’s simply not possible to show you everything with equal priority. This means no search engine offers a truly neutral search, there can always be bias in it.

The only thing I’d worry about over other search engines was if Duck Duck Go was systematically removing search results based on keywords, like if they were trying to make it never show results about the Holocaust or Tienanmen Square or so on even when those are explicitly searched for, or to only show results on certain topics from a tiny handful of selected sources. But I haven’t seen any evidence to suggest Duck Duck Go is doing this.

@CatherineHuffman@burggit.moe
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
1Y

Yes, exactly, thank you.

Different search engines will “censor” different results to bring you whatever is, in their opinion, the most relevant information to your inquiry. That’s their job. To sort the nonsense from the relevant info.

How is sending user data to Microsoft’s ad tracking service FUD? That’s exactly what privacy preserving browsers are supposed to stop.

Create a post

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more…


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

  • 1 user online
  • 4 users / day
  • 34 users / week
  • 91 users / month
  • 1.14K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 661 Posts
  • 11.1K Comments
  • Modlog