The government has merely “noted” – not accepted – 10 recommendations including to provide individuals with “an unqualified opt-out of receiving targeted advertising”, and the proposals to narrow the political exemption to the Privacy Act.
That decision will leave people exposed to “misleading” tactics including political parties or campaigns offering to facilitate postal votes in order to harvest their information, which the Australian Electoral Commission has complained about during the Indigenous voice referendum.
It agreed in principle that entities should be prohibited from targeting individuals based on sensitive information – such as race or sexual orientation – unless it is socially beneficial content.
Media companies had complained this could expose them to nuisance complaints or fishing expeditions designed to frustrate newsgathering by the subjects of public interest journalism.
Currently, most small businesses with an annual turnover of $3m or less are exempt from the Privacy Act and have no obligation to keep personal information secure or to notify affected individuals in the event of a data breach.
The government agreed in principle to remove this exemption, although the department recommended that an impact analysis, transition period and support package should be provided first.
The original article contains 693 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacyguides@lemmy.one
In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.
This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!
Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!
This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.
Moderation Rules:
We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.
Since only our users are affected and not our customers, we don’t consider it serious. /s
They are doing it for the money. Privacy is just an excuse.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The government has merely “noted” – not accepted – 10 recommendations including to provide individuals with “an unqualified opt-out of receiving targeted advertising”, and the proposals to narrow the political exemption to the Privacy Act.
That decision will leave people exposed to “misleading” tactics including political parties or campaigns offering to facilitate postal votes in order to harvest their information, which the Australian Electoral Commission has complained about during the Indigenous voice referendum.
It agreed in principle that entities should be prohibited from targeting individuals based on sensitive information – such as race or sexual orientation – unless it is socially beneficial content.
Media companies had complained this could expose them to nuisance complaints or fishing expeditions designed to frustrate newsgathering by the subjects of public interest journalism.
Currently, most small businesses with an annual turnover of $3m or less are exempt from the Privacy Act and have no obligation to keep personal information secure or to notify affected individuals in the event of a data breach.
The government agreed in principle to remove this exemption, although the department recommended that an impact analysis, transition period and support package should be provided first.
The original article contains 693 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!