Newb question: what does it really mean when I click “Reject Nonessential Cookies”? Am I really being any more private by rejecting these? Just feels greasy like it’s a workaround for websites to get my information anyway? Should I navigate away from any sites that suggest this cookie configuration?

foremanguy
link
fedilink
English
44M

If you’re a bit pro privacy you should use a browser that reset all the cookies at each closes. So it just doesn’t matter if you refused cookies or not. And you should 100% use Ublock Origin. If think that by default (or with some tweakings) it blocks most of the banners but if you’re not happy with only ublock, I suggest you to try I still don’t care about cookies

@OnePhoenix@lemmy.world
creator
link
fedilink
English
14M

Thanks. I currently use hardened Firefox (Arkenfox) and yes I do use unlock.

foremanguy
link
fedilink
English
24M

I think that even if you want to harden your Firefox you should use mullvad browser (or librewolf) and then harden it a bit if you want

@OnePhoenix@lemmy.world
creator
link
fedilink
English
14M

I’ve heard of these but haven’t given them a long look. What is it about mullvad or librewolf that people prefer over Firefox?

@Markaos@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
24M

As others said, configure your browser to store as few cookies as you can tolerate (because some actually useful stuff will break without them) and forget about these banners.

Although I do enjoy the ones that have actual usable toggles for “legitimate interests” - how nice of them, giving me an option to disable even cookies they can legally store with just a notice, and definitely not just hiding non-essential cookies into a vaguely defined category.

So I always go through the list and disable them one by one. It does nothing but waste my time, but I do it out of spite. Oh, and when I feel like really wasting my time, I send a bug report to whatever support email I can find on the site, about how the cookie banner accidentally let me disable essential cookies and should probably be fixed.

removed by mod

@helenslunch@feddit.nl
link
fedilink
English
34M

what does it really mean when I click “Reject Nonessential Cookies”?

It means “fuck you, if you use my site, you volunteer your personal data”.

Should I navigate away from any sites that suggest this cookie configuration?

You would have a bad time since that’s pretty much the entirety of the web.

I just set up my browser to block third party cookies, and first party cookies are deleted when I leave the site. The control is in your hands. Then just ignore those cookie preferences entirely. It’s like giving someone permission to come into your home but you don’t unlock the door.

@Ilandar@aussie.zone
link
fedilink
English
34M

See here.

I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/ and only whitelist web sites that I have accounts on.

Everything is fake crap. They pretend they care or don’t share but they can’t prove it. I assume that they are lying.

removed by mod

Gravitywell
link
fedilink
English
84M

Sites that give this option usually explain more detail about it. I pretty much always reject nonessential, since they tend to be advertising related.

Create a post

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more…


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

  • 1 user online
  • 6 users / day
  • 30 users / week
  • 110 users / month
  • 1.09K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 660 Posts
  • 11.1K Comments
  • Modlog