still hella confused as to why self-proclaimed privacy advocates—even teams like @privacyguides—are pushing @element so hard despite the data collection & sharing practices, the loosey-goosey metadata usage, and the fact that they host on AWS.
Of course, as soon as two people take this advice and then attempt to communicate, we have reached the standoff, where One of the two people must swear off their data sovereignty.
What is your idea to solve this?
With centralized messaging services, both of them must swear off their data sovereignty.
While with true peer to peer systems none of them must do that, that model is not really compatible with mobile devices as both the sender and the receiver has to be online at the same time for the message to go through, and generally any device that is not online 24/7, which mostly includes all desktop PCs.
For this reason, I think that for the average user (who does not have a 24/7 online server-role machine, or maybe even a desktop computer) the best solution is to choose a server operator who they trust with their data. Or, they may try to run a lightweight homeserver on their mobile device (laptop or even smartphone), and live with it’s shortcomings. Not like it’s not possible, and this way everyone can register where they want, including their own part-time server if they are more comfortable that way.
However I think I did not totally understand what is your exact concern.
Do you think it to be a problem that even if you run your own server, messages you sent to your friend on another one will be stored on that homeserver too?
If so, I don’t think it’s possible to solve that problem. They (your friend) have chosen to take a compromise between security and ease of use by trusting someone else with storage. You can’t tell them - only suggest - where should they store their data, otherwise they would lose their sovereignty over it.
Fortunately confidentiality can be kept with encryption, and if you are concerned with the other server having access to metadata, you could patch your server to try to generalize the message metadata to some extent, like with delaying sending messages to they 10th minute and such measures.
a federated service has all the downsides of a centralized service
No it doesn’t? A single party cannot block you from participating in the network, as you can just find a different provider, and you can have control over what servers may store your data, both as a server operator and as a room admin.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacyguides@lemmy.one
In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.
This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!
Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!
This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.
Moderation Rules:
We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.
What is your idea to solve this?
With centralized messaging services, both of them must swear off their data sovereignty.
While with true peer to peer systems none of them must do that, that model is not really compatible with mobile devices as both the sender and the receiver has to be online at the same time for the message to go through, and generally any device that is not online 24/7, which mostly includes all desktop PCs.
For this reason, I think that for the average user (who does not have a 24/7 online server-role machine, or maybe even a desktop computer) the best solution is to choose a server operator who they trust with their data. Or, they may try to run a lightweight homeserver on their mobile device (laptop or even smartphone), and live with it’s shortcomings. Not like it’s not possible, and this way everyone can register where they want, including their own part-time server if they are more comfortable that way.
However I think I did not totally understand what is your exact concern.
Do you think it to be a problem that even if you run your own server, messages you sent to your friend on another one will be stored on that homeserver too?
If so, I don’t think it’s possible to solve that problem. They (your friend) have chosen to take a compromise between security and ease of use by trusting someone else with storage. You can’t tell them - only suggest - where should they store their data, otherwise they would lose their sovereignty over it.
Fortunately confidentiality can be kept with encryption, and if you are concerned with the other server having access to metadata, you could patch your server to try to generalize the message metadata to some extent, like with delaying sending messages to they 10th minute and such measures.
deleted by creator
No it doesn’t? A single party cannot block you from participating in the network, as you can just find a different provider, and you can have control over what servers may store your data, both as a server operator and as a room admin.