California has some of the strongest digital privacy laws in the U.S. and is on the verge of handing consumers a major new tool to combat the sale and secret use of personal information they may never have agreed to share.
I can see this going similar way like the useless do not call list.
The legit companies that are operating in California getting clean and the scummy companies operating outside holding all the data and having a ball with them
You just have to make the request when you’re in the EU…
But they can’t prove I’m not… and I have very strong evidence that I could be with the passport. It’s simple to say that you use a USA based VPN as well. Ultimately you don’t have to unconditionally prove that your in the EU… most companies don’t want to deal with the hassle.
Companies are only allowed to operate within a given state if they comply with the laws, so a company unwilling to play by the rules will be committing financial suicide by losing business opportunities in the biggest tech industry state.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — You may not know it, but thousands of often shadowy companies routinely traffic in personal data you probably never agreed to share — everything from your real-time location information to private financial details.
Gavin Newsom still has to decide whether to sign the measure, whose impact could potentially extend well beyond state lines given California’s history of setting similar trends.
Privacy advocates have warned for years that location and seemingly non-specific personal data — often collected by advertisers and amassed and sold by brokers — can be used to identify individuals.
They also charge that the data often isn’t well secured and that the brokers aren’t covered by laws that require the clear consent of the person being tracked.
The general lack of U.S. restrictions on what brokers can do with the vast amount of data they collect means there’s aren’t many legal protections to prevent outsiders from spying on politicians, celebrities and just about anyone who is a target of idle curiosity, or malice.
The Pillar alleged “serial sexual misconduct” by Burrill, as homosexual activity is considered sinful under Catholic doctrine and priests are expected to remain celibate.
The original article contains 847 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacyguides@lemmy.one
In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.
This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!
Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!
This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.
Moderation Rules:
We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.
I can see this going similar way like the useless do not call list. The legit companies that are operating in California getting clean and the scummy companies operating outside holding all the data and having a ball with them
This is low-key one of the reasons I love being a dual-citizen. I hold an EU citizenship and use it regularly against companies.
Doesn’t the GDRP only apply if you’re living in the EU?
You just have to make the request when you’re in the EU…
But they can’t prove I’m not… and I have very strong evidence that I could be with the passport. It’s simple to say that you use a USA based VPN as well. Ultimately you don’t have to unconditionally prove that your in the EU… most companies don’t want to deal with the hassle.
So, is this any use against out of state or country actors ? Otherwise borderline useless, the scum will move.
Companies are only allowed to operate within a given state if they comply with the laws, so a company unwilling to play by the rules will be committing financial suicide by losing business opportunities in the biggest tech industry state.
Imagine living in the EU. GDPR is fun, but there are ways around it for companies.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — You may not know it, but thousands of often shadowy companies routinely traffic in personal data you probably never agreed to share — everything from your real-time location information to private financial details.
Gavin Newsom still has to decide whether to sign the measure, whose impact could potentially extend well beyond state lines given California’s history of setting similar trends.
Privacy advocates have warned for years that location and seemingly non-specific personal data — often collected by advertisers and amassed and sold by brokers — can be used to identify individuals.
They also charge that the data often isn’t well secured and that the brokers aren’t covered by laws that require the clear consent of the person being tracked.
The general lack of U.S. restrictions on what brokers can do with the vast amount of data they collect means there’s aren’t many legal protections to prevent outsiders from spying on politicians, celebrities and just about anyone who is a target of idle curiosity, or malice.
The Pillar alleged “serial sexual misconduct” by Burrill, as homosexual activity is considered sinful under Catholic doctrine and priests are expected to remain celibate.
The original article contains 847 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!